<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>O&#39;rourke on Wikiales</title>
    <link>/tags/orourke/</link>
    <description>Recent content in O&#39;rourke on Wikiales</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>es-es</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/orourke/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>2020 candidates ranked.</title>
      <link>/posts/2020-candidates-ranked./</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/2020-candidates-ranked./</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#39;s been a week since I started my &lt;a href=&#34;https://young.politics.blog/2018/11/19/the-case-for-biden-for-president/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;“The case for”&lt;/a&gt; series, and I&#39;ve writen about all the major candidates and &lt;a href=&#34;https://young.politics.blog/2018/11/25/the-case-for-richard-ojeda-andrew-yang-and-john-delaney-for-president/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;three minor ones&lt;/a&gt; since. On Sunday, I promised that today I would bring you my power ranking of 2020 democratic presidential contenders, a mere 15 months away from the Iowa caucuses. I&#39;m not going to beat around the bush &lt;strong&gt;now&lt;/strong&gt;, but I&#39;m going to do a whole lot of that after the ranking itself, so there&#39;s no shortage of information. Without further ado, here they are:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The case for Beto for president.</title>
      <link>/posts/the-case-for-beto-for-president./</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/the-case-for-beto-for-president./</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgH4HkgBUFk&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;way too many months,&lt;/a&gt; the Texas senate race was both closely followed by most people and &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/10/02/anti-trump-anti-business-beto-orourke-wont-beat-ted-cruz/?utm_term=.948c605be1ff&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;utterly dismissed&lt;/a&gt; by some prominent personalities. Kavanaugh seemed to &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/upshot/elections-poll-txsen-2.html&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;give Ted Cruz a bump,&lt;/a&gt; even if it probably wore off, and early indicators looked good for his challenger, Beto O&#39;Rourke. Early voting, while it doesn&#39;t mean much, looked pretty decent for democrats, an some final polls showed the race &lt;a href=&#34;https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/senate/texas/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;really close.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;And it was. The Texas senate race &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/texas/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;was closer&lt;/a&gt; than many expected. Early on election night it even seemed like Beto had a puncher&#39;s chance at unseating Ted Cruz, which would have been an upset by a lot of standards. However, Cruz retained his seat by about 3%, and he should be happy that he was up this year and not 2022 or something similar, as Texas is getting bluer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
